Summary List Placement
The Supreme Court in a Monday morning ruling dismissed as moot a case over former President Donald Trump blocking Twitter users who criticized him.
The Supreme Court vacated a ruling from the Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit that found that Trump violated the First Amendment in blocking Twitter users from his former account @realdonaldtrump. The justices ordered the case to be remanded back to the 2nd Circuit for dismissal.
When Trump left office on January 20, the case changed to listing “Joseph Biden Jr., president of the United States,” as the petitioner appealing the case, even though Biden himself has nothing to do with the case.
Read more: Trump and his advisors are shrugging off DOJ’s Capitol riot probe. But they see danger in the Georgia and New York investigations.
Justice Clarence Thomas cited the “change in Presidential administration” as the reason why the Court was correct in dismissing the case. The case is also now moot because Trump has been banned from the platform for nearly three months.
Twitter permanently suspended Trump from Twitter on January 8, 2021, two days after the insurrection waged by Trump supporters on the US Capitol on January 6.
Another Trump-era case ends with a whimper: SCOTUS declares the fight over whether Trump could block critics on Twitter moot. The court did vacate the 2nd Circuit opinion on this, which had ruled against Trump (see: https://t.co/hk761Ms8a4) https://t.co/sNVt2amewV pic.twitter.com/K1TukxVHxa
— Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) April 5, 2021
The case, the first of its kind, began in 2017 when the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, representing seven Twitter users who had been blocked by Trump, sued the Trump administration for the actions on First Amendment grounds.
Trump posted official presidential statements, policy changes, and proclamations from his Twitter account, making it a “public forum” and blocking Twitter users abridged their First Amendment right to petition their government for redress, the Knight Institute argued.
In Trump’s defense, the Department of Justice said that because the former president was blocking users from a personal account, taking legal action against it would be akin to violating his personal property rights.
District court judge Naomi Reice Buchwald ruled in the Knight Institute’s favor in May 2018, finding that because Trump’s Twitter feed was “a designated public forum,” Trump had, in fact, violated the First Amendment by blocking users.
Her decision was affirmed by a three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit on appeal in 2019. The full nine-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit declined to rehear the case en banc — or as a whole circuit court — in March 2020. The Trump administration then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari — petitioning the court to review the case — in August 2020.
The people Trump had blocked included activists, journalists, and celebrity Chrissy Teigen, who built up a following partly through her strongly-worded retorts at the president, including calling him “a p—- a– b—-” at one point in 2019.
In
Source::
Stock Market: Suez Canal Update! Floating!
The Suicide Squad | Official IMAX® Red Band Trailer
From the horribly beautiful mind of James Gunn and filmed in IMAX. Experience